Table 1 |
|||
|
Percentuals of answers to the proposed questions |
|||
|
ANSWERES' PERCENTAGES |
|||
|
|
|||
|
PROPOSED QUESTIONS |
Yes |
No |
Others |
|
|
|||
|
1. Have you read the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes algorithm proposed by ADA/EASD? |
90 |
10 |
- |
|
2. Were you aware that the document expresses the opinion of a few authors and not of the entities involved? |
77 |
23 |
- |
|
3. Do you intend to adopt the stages and steps suggested by this algorithm in your practice? |
51 |
49 |
- |
|
4. Do you think that rosiglitazone-associated adverse events have been ratified in the medical literature of excellence? |
36 |
64 |
- |
|
5. Do you think that the cardiovascular protection assigned topioglitazone in that Position Statement is real? |
34 |
66 |
- |
|
6. Do you think that glitazone-associated adverse events (bone fracture and cardiovascular events) are effects pertaining to this therapeutical class? |
49 |
21 |
30 |
|
|
|||
|
7. Do you think that only GLP-1 analogs should be included in diabetes treatment excluding DPP-4 inhibitors? |
13 |
69 |
18 |
|
8. Do you think that BDS' members have the expertise and the ability of criticism to issue a Position Statement about this Algorithm? |
87 |
4 |
9 |
|
|
|||
|
Gomes MB. Enquete sobre Algoritmo ADA/EASD - December 2008 - 217 Sócios da SBD. Available at: http://www.diabetes.org.br/agenda/comunicados/index.php?id=1838 webcite. Accessed on: July 13, 2009. |
|||
|
Lerario et al. Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome 2010 2:35 doi:10.1186/1758-5996-2-35 |
|||